Syndicate/Guild/Faction/Armada Wars Input

Discussion in 'General Discussions' started by Kendall, May 25, 2011.

  1. polishpimp

    polishpimp Well-Known Member

    "from what Ive seen"....Has it already started in MWs?

    The comment from Kendall in his opening statement..."There will be a new option to opt-in for war, once opted in your group will be visible to all others in the War even if it is set to private".....sounds as if u "opt in" then u will be able to war with any other guild that has opted in.
    I definitely could be wrong...wouldnt be the first time....lol. Hopefully Kendall will chime in soon on some of the questions we all have asked
     
  2. polishpimp

    polishpimp Well-Known Member

    @ Kendall... I think that once a guild has "opted in".....they should not be able to "opt out" until that current season they "opted in" for is completed.

    This would be similar to what u did with the "privacy " feature. With that said.....once u choose to go hidden....arent you not suppose to be able to change that status for 2 weeks? Ive seen more than one guild go "hidden" and then become visible in the next day or two, whats up with that...a grace period or glitch?

    I think I may have identified a way for some to take advantage of the "guild wars" using unscrupulous means, I dont wish to mention it here in the forums as I dont wish to give any body any ideas....lol. So i will send u an e-mail....please be on the look out for it...TY!
     
  3. polishpimp

    polishpimp Well-Known Member

    Will guilds be able to swap out members during a season? I understand the need for guilds to able to add a member in the event a particular member leaves or is unable to play. Im thinking that a guild should be limited as to how many substitutions can be made during a season in an effort to stave off abuse of this feature. Although it seems pretty reasonable that a guild may have to swap out a couple members during a season due to "life happening" , but anything more than that would seem excessive and possibly in an effort to be able to acquire more points once another player has maxed out.
     
  4. mama356

    mama356 New Member

    Me BootyHoard 100,000,000,000 Coins 2 Skill Points 11% Complete is not moving from 11% and i have put alot more money in there.Can someone help me out with this problem please.
     
  5. Kendall

    Kendall Administrator

    The limit would be based on a individual to individual basis. So that you could not just sit on one target to collect War Points. You would have to spread out to all. Maybe 250 attacks is too much for the day?
     
  6. Kendall

    Kendall Administrator

    There would be no significant advantage to hitting "alts" with how the scoring is presented, the normal player would always have the advantage.

    Plus we haven't conceded anything, we continue to take action on duplicate accounts as they come up.
     
  7. Kendall

    Kendall Administrator

    It is funny, that higher levels say that it will cater to lower levels and lower levels say it will cater to lower levels. What about the middle levels?

    But really, this is a War feature and the results will not be based on higher or lower levels alone, the point is to use strategy to come out on top.
     
  8. Kendall

    Kendall Administrator

    We could do that. But I would think that having an allied guild/faction, the purpose would be to work together and to keep them out of your guild/factions cross hairs.
     
  9. Kendall

    Kendall Administrator

    The Higher levels will have the advantage in total number of actions that they can complete (cash / stamina), the lower levels may or may not have more targets depending on who signs up for the wars.

    I think this will be a wait and see in action type of thing.
     
  10. Kendall

    Kendall Administrator

    This is the intent with the feature and is favored over adding in a PVP block feature.
     
  11. Kendall

    Kendall Administrator

    You can still fight alone. This just gives another aspect to the game which I think, high level / mid level / low level / late game players will enjoy, that is if they don't mind getting killed a couple times.
     
  12. Kendall

    Kendall Administrator

    OK, why are you not in a guild?
     
  13. Kendall

    Kendall Administrator

    The the thought behind giving more points was because it will cost $$ to set them.
     
  14. AresDeimos

    AresDeimos Member


    say you have one or two particular people in the game that you are constantly fighting with... yes you have your factions for this whole new score keeping and what not but there are always some babies in each faction new players and what not which will hinder the whole faction war thing not really there fault you know but what if you could create a way where you can personally go to war with someone say one on one and have a point system for that as well? cause me myself id love to go to war with people but i know my low level and new players in the game in my faction would take the brunt of the war for they would be the easy targets and the easy way for the opposing faction to get war points.. but a personal war option i think would be kinda kick ass and bring alot more fun into this app and my even bring those more dormant players back... just a thought figured id throw it out there
     
  15. Bo Baby

    Bo Baby Member

    i believe that statement is what i was referring to and no it has not started in MWs yet, but it just sounds to me the same as an alliance/enemy request where u have to accept the war between the 2 syns

    now if it is different then they are going against the fact that they put the privacy feature in, which is a knock on their decision making since this is what was "forced" into action so anything going forward cannot knock that backwards

    for that reason i am curious to see how this will work bc if everyone has to go unhidden again just to participate i wonder how many people will actually do this...
     
  16. Kendall

    Kendall Administrator

    On first release, we will be doing great to to get out a full fledged scoring system that captures the winners, after we get input on if it is fun or not we can then look at adding further incentive to participating. Makes sense to give some kind of award since there will be so much carnage.
     
  17. polishpimp

    polishpimp Well-Known Member

    @kendall please look for email i sent...lol
     
  18. Kendall

    Kendall Administrator

    Right now, we are thinking that attack XP ranges would still apply, rules of the game would stay the same so it would require strategy depending on where you are in the game on how you can collect the most number of points on opposing enemies.
     
  19. Kendall

    Kendall Administrator

    No it has not gone live. I wanted to give the community a chance to add input and comments on this feature before it goes live. We get feedback that "Kano Sucks" and that "Kano doesn't listen to players", etc... So with this feature (even though it does take longer development time to get input from the community) I wanted to make sure everyone from all games had a chance to discuss and have input.
     
  20. Bo Baby

    Bo Baby Member

    the middle lvls have the best of both worlds and dont come into play here bc they are just low enough to still list a lot of lower lvls (half of their lvl) and they are just high enough to be able to actually beat some of the higher lvls which is why i dont mention the middle lvls in my posts

    middle lvls i consider as lvl500-lvl999
     

Share This Page