Why? I just hitlist attacked them, I didnt list them. Why should they be given a chance to endlessly ambush me, just because someone else listed them (probably for ambushing them) If its not a fight win, It shouldn't renew the attack count. Always been my opinion. The way it is leaves loopholes the size of the grand canyon.
Im speaking for ZS, where somebody can potentially ambush you for days on end if they feel like committing most of their 75 available to you. Really, there are ways in zs to make it where a particular player can never attack you and win again for all eternity. Even if you have 1 defense. Thats legit huh? if you feel that way... Why would you even start a thread like this?
I know all about ZS and I even suggested before dropping it down to 10 counters for ZS...hell even 5 counters for ZS seems fair.
either way you fix it will work. but it is BROKEN, always has been, and only been made worse over time with the increase in XP. the removal of placement on rivals, and the fact that they dont even count against the price until you attack somone after ambushing.
It is broken , if a low weak level player can constantly use a 32 or 37% boost against a stronger player, stronger in all areas and then hide behind counters and I mean alot of counters like, 9,000 plus come on this is a real cowardly way to play, just adding to attack and using counters as a default defense is as bad as the cage matching situation that was tweaked a bit to at least let players get some xp back from fighting a cager, or selling off all the rule for those bounty fests so someone could get an achievement, it is insulting to players who play the game the way it was intended, not perverting features in the game to suit their twisted way of playing.
