this has been up several times would be real easy to fix but isnt a big deal just alwasy keep an eye on your energy and stam max amount and youll never have to worry about not getting full amount... unless you are below lvl 1k(and even at that lvl if you alocate stats good wont have to worry about it)
I've given up on this. I lost more energy again last night when I leveled up before I checked to see that I was close to my limit. Oh well, it's only energy.
Yes, and it has happened to me countless times over 3 years plus of playing. Does it really matter if it's fixed now? I'm approaching level 4k, so I guess it's not hurting me too much.
just because it hasn't happened yet doesn't mean we should give up. every lost energy adds up still think it would be great if they stacked up.
i was thinking that the 1 stam should be renamed to something along the lines quick attack and still cost 1 stam and energy and wouldnt cost raid health hence why its called quick attack
it's been talked about over and over again would love to see it happen but unless you max out the threshold that kano has set then I'm not holding my breath for this to happen anytime soon.
so do it for those that have the max and not everyone else? that's stupid. no one should lose anything upon leveling (including health, now that you can power heal) simply because you're close to your max when you level.
i didn't think about health. now you can go past your maximum health. why do you have to lose ANY when you level up?
Id like to see some kind of input from kano before i debate this issue, if they're not going to do it no matter what then it's a dead issue and we're all wasting our time
good point about the health. health is now allowed to go past max. why wouldn't this happen when you level up then?
I don't see any issue with it personally, but I'll bring it up with the team when everyone is back from the Holidays.
It doesn't seem that the ideas section is even being monitored anymore. So much for the impact of player input. I wouldn't be happy to hear a "no" on this, but I'd rather hear that than Simon and Garfunkel.
First time I'm seeing this post; what a great idea. Maybe if enough people start liking and replying we can get the ball rolling on this again.