For the most part I agree on not removing the def. stance. The exceptions being....
1. if it were mathematically impossible for a player to advance ( yes, i realize this would be very rare)
2. If the player has been inactive. An inactive player isnt rewarded in the top 50 anyways....they shouldnt be allowed to hold up the show either. I also think the "attack limit" needs to be raised for players to get rewards in the top 50. 100 attacks is embarrassing low, and with the loopholes that already promote inactivity....do we really want to reward it? Kanos lack of balance has made an advantage for the accounts that are set up for not battling in the main game......any account can get 1oo hits in...even if its a level 660 vs a 10k,
Last edited: Jan 22, 2013