Hey peeps my thoughts on this latest battle arena personally it went well for me I ranked out at 907 but I managed 32 kills there getting 57 levels and around 600-700 battle drops so I'm happy, But here's a suggestion if its possible!! I know some people wont like this idea but I dont care its the best option. After the arena is finished whoever hasnt had over a certain amount of attacks e.g 3k they should be ranked out completely..It wil stop the people playing the non active game..yes I know some players cant get on myself included the last 2 the start times were just not possible for me so I told some clannies to kill me off but some players are just sitting there doing nothing on purpose hoping for a spot, I know I'm no the only one who finds this annoying especially if players like myself use a lot of fp's refilling stamina and yes I know thats my choice but i'll be damned if people are just gonna sit there on purpose do nothing and finish higher than me if something can be done about it like ranking them out and moving the actives to a higher rank then this should be done. This is not a rant its just the truth!!
Inactives have just as much of a chance to get knocked out(even more of a chance to get knocked out) Inactives ain't the problem,its everyone that doesn't go after the inactives that should rethink.
So you think low stam players should waste UN's to make the big boys jobs easier..lol Wasting UN's on refills is not a clever tactic if yer not gonna have a top finish unless your only interest is making levels.
I posted this as a separate thread, but it's appropriate for here.... Something for nothing Profile: FLICKERSCREENcatchME Your Rank is 201! Rewards include: 1 241,876,950,000 96,736 Attacks 0 Kills 0 Wins 27 Losses 645 Thanks Kano for the freebeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee..lmao http://forums.kanoapps.com/showthread.php?8372-Something-for-nothing&p=71852#post71852 You guys keep banging yer heads against the wall and I'll keep picking up the freebee's.. Why?? Because I will as long as it's this easy..
This topic has been discussed at great length many times here in the forums and by far the majority agrees with the OP. Many ideas have been suggested but Kanos only answer was to cut a players health 15% after 6 hrs and less than 100 attacks which in my opinion is a complete joke. It just doesnt matter....whether its an inconvenient start time, joined just to get the XP , an emergency or your dog ate your homework...if your not there and participate a reasonable amount ya dont deserve more than those that are there and actively participating and supporting these games...PERIOD! Players already get free XP for joining whether they swing their axe or not....I would say something for nothing is pretty damn nice, now....how about a lil something something for the ones that are actively paying and supporting the game by spending stamina other than a good ole fashion kick in the teeth. give me a break.....it makes zero sense that a player regardless of level can have 10s of thousands of attacks and still have an army of players who either are home in bed or playing some other companies games rank higher than them. Its easily the most ridiculous thing about the arena.....it promotes inactivity. A couple of things could be done. Either cut an inactives heath by 50% after 6 hrs. Only cut 15% after 6 hours but continue to cut an additional 5% every hour there after . Do not award the arena payouts until the arena is completely over and move all the the inactive down the ranks and all the active players up in order of the number of attacks they had. The arena is supposed to reward and encourage balanced builds but this is not necessarily the case. If a player has extremely high health and low attack and def they get huge arena health and a lousy kill reward not to mention they give crappy XP. Who wants to go after these extremely unattractive targets? More times than not theses types of builds end up ranking quite well without doing a thing. A stiffer inactivity penalty would go a long ways towards eliminating these loopholes.
sighs....omg what next...me agreeing with LB???????????? polish is right.....all points are spot on...
So, basically what your saying is that players without over 3k attacks should not be given a reward? I do not play facebook viking clan, but i do play myspace viking clan. I dont think i have never did over 3k attacks, i think the most i have did was like 2.4k or so. And with that amount of attacks i have pulled off 7th and 4th place. So i guess i should not have got a reward? Everybody that ranks for a reward regardless of how many or how little of attacks they have deserves that reward.
No not at all I said 3k as an example ..it would be so much better if they could keep track of actually activity of play. If your account has just sat there and done nothing or hasnt done a certain amount of attacks then you done get ranked...Its called "battle arena" ..not "Lets just sit here do nothing hope nobody notices me and I get a good reward arena"..I know there's only a slight difference in the names but it is there.
not sure where u came up with the the 3k number. What i am saying is a player with 0 attacks should not do better than someone like u for example who may have had 2400 attacks but gets knocked out early. Depending on how many players actually are active it is conceivable that a player with no attacks could still rank...just not higher than anyone one who has attacks. For example....if 300 players join the arena but only 95 players actually attacked someone than 5 inactive players would still rank in the top 100
heres an example AKk, lets say your not a PIMP member and your in the arena battling your ass off for the first 2 hours and amass a couple thousand attacks and a few kills...but then u steal one of my kills, guess whats going to happen next.....u get killed by me and all the stamina and time u just spent supporting kano and its battle arena got u ranked waaaay outta the top 100 while dozens if not hundreds of other players that didnt even bother to show up and swing their axe place in the top 100 and are reaping the benefits of doing so for doing nothing. At that point all your hard work accomplished was to help others who did nothing do better, does that seem right? It would be different if the vast majority werent inactive.....then ya could kinda just chalk it up to bad luck/timing, but the fact is that most players in the arena are inactive and the few players that are taking the time and spending the stamina are getting knocked out way before the inactives
Ok now i get it, i just had a misunderstanding about what he ws saying. I thought he was saying that people that didnt have over 3k attacks shouldnt get anything, but what he was really saying was that people that did attack should get ranked higher then ones with no attacks.
