The suggestion has been made by many people as well as by some people internally that we should perhaps have an ideas board per game to keep them separated and more focused. What does the community think?
It sounds good but wouldn't that create a mess with ideas that are universal across the board? We would have to go back and dig through a bunch of posts to figure out if a certain idea has been included in a specific game. Most ideas are universal and if we were to miss something someone posted over on a different game and it was implemented for all the games it would not be cool to have missed out on discussing it.
That's fine with me as long as any accepted idea for the individual game is kept to that specific game and not accepted as a blanket for the rest of the games as well.
I feel we need to separate the idea section better, or just inform people on the forum that they should click on the game of their choice for their ideas, some ideas do not work for all games, PC and VC are very similar but still have slight differences, LCN, I have no idea, and what I see in VS it is different also, in different areas of play
I know there are slight differences in the games but the majority of the changes in the past are universal across all the games. I wish we had different sections for each game but I know it will be more jumbled and harder to keep track of by Kano and the players.
That's one thing I don't want to happen though unless it's voted on by the players of all the games. For instance, I opposed the reduction of punch time from an hour to 30 minutes in LCN because KANO has a habit of making one change universal throughout all the games. I agree though that adding more confusion to the forum would just serve to slow KANO down. There are threads from months ago that haven't even been classified as accepted or rejected. The developers should review the idea and then decide whether they will work on it or not and go ahead and place "accepted" or "rejected" on the threads before working on the idea in secret. We have no clue what ideas have been discussed at KANO, there's no clue what ideas KANO is working on, looking at, or possibly incorporating. Some idea threads don't even have feedback from any of the developers. Threads with high ratings even.
Its not a horrible idea...but Im more inclined to agree with Jerome that most ideas r pretty universal and/or most players play multiple games. I think its its pretty easy now to separate game ideas as most players specify which game and the ideas that r specific to one game r in the minority. I also think that if a good idea was to be posted in a game specific area that would be good for all games...it would just be a hassle to post in all of them separately My vote is .."if it aint broke...dont fix it" which is derived from the K.I.S.S school of thought
if people would be more specific when they refer to the game their idea is for, ,would be helpful for sure,
I have had several ideas , maybe I am different ,but every single idea I think I have ever thought of would be applicable to any of the Kano games. There's not many ideas that would not apply to every game and if an idea happens to be a game specific idea then it is pretty transparent as to that fact if you play the games.
