Im glad you offered your opinion...its why I started the thread in the first place...to hear diff opinions and to see if I could be convinced otherwise.
I think a lot of things can aid in a player quitting the game including your example...I just dont see it as a reason to change things, with every change u simply make someone else want to leave the game for a diff reason, where would it ever end? In my last reply...i wasnt referring to a player quitting all together...rather in reply to the statement that an attacker can stop them from progressing, a player can still perform all actions and continue to level to their hearts content even if someone is attacking them nonstop, The only thing holding them back would be themselves. If they quit the game altogether....my guess would be that it was inevitable that they were going to quit at some point anyhow, thats not meant to criticize...merely that it may not have been the game for them in the first place. Ive personally tried numerous games...some i realized right away werent for me, other s which took much longer, either way I just went looking for something else that suited me. When I first found Kano games it took me but an hour or so to realize that things were be a lil rough and thats what kept me around, I personally like things that offer a bit of a challenge as I use it as motivation to keep moving forward
In the end....Its the the lower levels actions that put them on the higher levels rival list, if the attacks continue its because they continue to put themselves on ones rival page. if they cant hack playing the game the way it was set up from when they began....then one has to wonder why they;re playing it in the first place and why they think it should be changed just for them when obviously there has been tens of thousands that came before them who made these games successful just the way they are.
Like I said previously....I dont play that way and dont think the majority play that way either. There will always be the A-holes out there but for me thhe game simply wouldnt be the same without them because there simply isnt anything sweeter then eventually turning the tables on them.
I attack a player that is about 1 k ahead of me in levels every chance i get while winning every battle other than the counters, this player rarely attacks me back, does this make me a bully? Im obviously much stronger than him...yet hes much higher in level. This is the only player on my rival page so i go after him as often as possible.... would this be stalking?
I simply dont understand why ones level makes any difference at all, its just a matter of whether one player is stronger than the other regardless of whether they r the same level, higher or lower. If u can beat a player regardless of level....how many attack is to many before it constitutes "bullying"? When the low level player who r crying "bully" are starting out and leveling by going down their rival page.....do u think they keep attacking those they cant beat.... or do they move onto the next player they can beat and then attack them into the hospital and continuing to do so if they continue to heal ....would this not be bullying? You gave a "real life" example earlier so I shall do the same. Two guys have a disagreement but one has a black belt in Karate and keeps knocking the other guy to the ground but the other keeps getting back up and taking swings....at this point the black belt knows hes to much for this guy, is he bully if he keeps laying him out or is it justified?
Last edited: Apr 12, 2012