WRONG! If you are on the bounty list the inevitable outcome is that you are going to be killed no matter what. Does it matter who does it, no! Likewise the bounty hunter does not give a damn who you are or what you've done to get there. All they want is the reward money. Killing the player is just something they have to do to get the money just like completing the adventure is something they have to do to earn the skill points. If you placed a bounty on the player who bountied you, they would be just as eager to collect on that. Hard to imagine a PvP action that is more impersonal than bounty hunting.
WRONG! Past about level 100 money becomes meaningless. All you really need is enough to pay for all the weapons and warriors you can use and then the upkeep of them all. When my level was in the 300s I regularly had about 150 billion coin on hand and my upkeep was about 15% of my income (at higher levels legendary warriors can soak up a bit more cash but needs are still essentially they same). If for example I had taken your bounty of 14 trillion how would this have been a 'game changer'? There would have been nothing that I needed that I could spend it on. I may be missing some nuance of play here so could you actually spell out the game changing aspect of have a huge influx of spare cash that I remain ignorant of?
Well if they don't win they lose 1 stamina and a bit of health isn't that punishment enough
.
In the same medium as you hysterical rant above, if someone takes one swing at you and just succeeds in knocking some of the dandruff of your shoulder do they really deserve to be tortured for 24 hours then killed? During the closing days of Hi5, as an experiment I did a single, harmless, bounty attack on one of the biggies. As a result I was attacked multiple times; axe-slapped and bountied. If that sounds like a reasonable response to you then your jacket should tie up in the back with leather straps.
So let's get this straight even though you get "extremely crappy" XP you still go to the trouble of killing them. In your own words, "wheres the benefit?". I assume you could get better XP by hitting an entry on your Valhalla list.
Yes I too get annoyed at all the whining, bitching and moaning that occurs when someone thinks something in the game is directly geared towards not being fair to them.
http://forums.kanoapps.com/showthread.php?6745-Battle-Drops-Coming-Friday-March-16!/page2 Post #19
Sorry you seem to be raving again. You imply that someone would: pick a name at random; Check their stats to see if their bounty amount was low enough; then spend good money to bounty them. All in order to accomplish what?
Similarly you say people get bountied for not being liked. Logic says that if you do not like someone they have done something to make themselves disliked. If you dislike someone that may indeed be a good enough reason to bounty them.
WRONG! What I said was there in plain sight in my original post that you quoted. This was, that only the one setting the bounty and the one who actually claimed it should be placed on the rivals list.
So, as it's not the case, I guess we'll never get to see what would make bullying pale in comparison to if no recourse were available.
WRONG! I am suggesting that only those who stand a chance against the bountied player (as well as the payer and collector) should be placed on their rivals list. If the ones far above who actually beat you and get XP get a free pass why shouldn't the lower levels who took a chance but won nothing escape as well.
UTTER CLAPTRAP! Even the most mediocre of players can make a name for themselves it they hang around long enough. There is living proof of this on MySpace.
Click to expand...