Weekly Gamer Point Syndicate Challenge Reward and Recently Banned Accounts

When accts are found to be illegal and become banned.. why arent the prior weeks rewards adjusted. gamer points from accounts (that were found to be illegal and banned) were used by a syn should be subtracted from that syn prior weeks gamer totals and placement reevaluated ..that way the syn(s) who follow the rules are rewarded with the bonus exp they should have gotten.?

eg... we came in 4th in gamer contest and would have came in 3rd if the banned accts gamer points were not allowed to count in that syn total for the week..... Im just sayin why should a syn who foillows the rules not recieve the exp reward they should have earned because another syn decides to use accts that do not follow the terms of agreement?

 

because you would have to prove everyone in the syndicate knew the banned account was doing something wrong to punish them

 

Yes if anyone is cheating or banned ,their points should be adjusted and it has been my experience that the rest know what is going on, especially the leader,who may be the one doing the cheating.

 

How often are people actually banned? Expecially from syndicates that place towards the top of the rewards?

Is it actually enough to make a difference? If so it might be an idea to punish the syndicate and make sure they're playing by the rules.

 

SO U WOULD HAVE TO PROVE THAT EVERYONE KNEW IN THE OTHER SYN TO GIVE THE RIVAL SYN THE EXP THEY SHOULD HAVE GOT..?? JUST DONT TAKE THE EXP FROM THE FIRST SYN.. BUT AT LEAST GIVE THE RIVAL SYN THE EXP THEY SHOULD HAVE GOTTEN..IM JUST SAYIN..WHY PUNISH THOSE WHO FOLLOW THE RULES BY NOT AWARDING THE BONUSES THEY SHOULD HAVE GOTTEN..