A [friendly!] caution to the conspiracy theorists...
I've put a lot - okay, an obsessive - amount of work and consideration into the math and logic of these sorts of strategy games. For me, therein lies the challenge. And of course, it is generally only most equitable if everyone's playing by the same spirit of the rules. But, life IS about surviving, even thriving, in the face of inequity. After all, no matter the means, accentuating one thing always comes at the expense of some other. The net effect or definition of "cheating" is a slippery-slope of a definition.
In experience with these types of games, most anyone with better strategy or management of resources - or the blessing of "real-world" resources to add to the game - are often branded "cheaters" by those they may defeat or challenge... merely because a short-sighted challenger can't imagine how someone else might be superior to them.
God help me, had I devised a quick and reliable method of mechanical fire-starting in the mid-1600's.
I'm just saying... it's a bandwagon upon which all too many people are more than ready to jump.
And it can be an unfair and insulting thing to be branded with.
That said,
please enlighten me (as the MW-lcn noob I am) regarding some 'hitlist' mindsets:
What makes it the norm (except for me, it appears) that hitlisted players passionately go back and thoroughly pulverize (or annoy, as the case may be) every player who hit them, while on the HITlist?
My logic is that, that's expected, and the hunter has no malice... if I am angry about being listed, it is the sole doing of the person who put me there - and they alone who truly would deserve retribution.
Further, where, even, is the sport in squashing someone mentioned above, if they are, say, 5000+ levels below you? Did you not appreciate those free and easy wins? Is it not a good thing, to accumulate those while riding the list?
I don't understand the guiding philosophy, here.
Click to expand...